Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precharge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 12:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Precharge

Not notable. Advert. Benjaminstewart05:-) 11:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Article has been revised to be more focused on general information related to preCharge. Please note, preCharge is #2 in this space, whereas cybersource is in fact listed in Wikipedia. precharge 11:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, vanispamvertisement, fails WP:CORP. --Coredesat talk 11:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Note that contributor is same name as company/article, raising POV question and evident self-promotion. Fails WP:CORP. Tychocat 11:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

preCharge meets "Criteria for companies and corporations" #1. preCharge meets "Criteria for products and services" #1. User:precharge 11:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Fails WP:CORP for not having "multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself." Tychocat 11:53, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Nominated for G7 by author. Tevildo 12:02, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Felt it was Wiki ready but the masses didn't agree. Thanks all. User:precharge 12:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.