Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prayerware
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Prayerware
Non-notable term. Only two examples given, and the term yielded 944 Google links for me. - Sikon 15:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete neologism. --InShaneee 16:53, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as neologism. Where did this word come from? eaolson 17:44, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete neologism.--Nilfanion (talk) 18:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per everybody. ReverendG 21:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete neologism TheRanger 23:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep an obscure term with adequate documentation. It should be in Wikipedia. And even if it is a neologism, the two examples when such should be deleted doesn't apply here. It verifyable in two cases, and it gives encyclopedic description and comparative analysis to other similar terms. It also adds value to similar terms in "Category:Software distribution". -- Henriok 10:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Documented, factual & verifiable. Used in several cases. Would not oppose merge and redirect to a suitable article on obscure copyright licenses. — David Remahl 10:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete, many of the google hits are for an unrelated software program called Prayerware. I don't believe we should have articles on really obscure licenses; I'm trying to clean out these articles from Template:Software distribution at the moment. If the info must be merged, an appropriate place would be the article otherware. Graham87 10:28, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.