Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Vir Shastri Avenue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 03:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Prakash Vir Shastri Avenue

Non-notable street. Just because the person it was named after is notable and it has a notable landmark, does not make the street, itself notable. No source presented has more than a passing mention of the street. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Jesus do some people have nothing better to do that search Wikipedia for things they think are non-notable? It's notable. Stop trying to ruin Wikipedia by deleting everything. Xanucia 23:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The references do mention the street's name. I am unsure of how to get you to stop haranguing about this other than translating the Hindi to English for you, which I just don't think is practical. Chantoke 23:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Seems to meet WP:50k comfortably. Grutness...wha? 01:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Appears to be New Delhi's equivalent of one of the List of state-named roadways in Washington, D.C.. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 03:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - So I guess the Pennsylvania Avenue article should be deleted because it's just named after a state and has a couple of landmarks on it (including the address of a president of a country with a smaller popolation than India) like this street does. This is deletionism gone array. --Oakshade 17:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 19:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - When I nominated it, the sources did not name the street. Perhaps the Hindi sources do, now, but I can't tell. The English-language sources still do not, except for those mentioning the name change. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 01:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.