Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Systems CAD

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel Case 03:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Power Systems CAD

Power Systems CAD (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Reads like possible spam. Doesn't seem to be a notable CAD (rather low amount of Google hits). Speedy was contested. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 18:00, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep (with some cleanup/expansion) or Merge into another article (Computer-aided design or Power engineering may be appropriate, someone else may be able to suggest somewhere better). It's a highly specified field granted, but the information would be of use to anyone interested in Power engineering. --Darksun 18:05, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep This is a specific area of engineering expertise, recognized by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE.) According to IEEE, there are 21,000 power systems engineers worldwide focused on improving electrical grids, eliminating blackouts, and reducing electrical accidents. This page will be enhanced by the creator -- and hopefully others -- in coming weeks. Jrneumann 21:00, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Jrneumann
    • Keep Thanks for the input, Hammer. More refs added. Think we're good now. Jrneumann 21:00, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Jrneumann
      • Note:' The comment above should not have appeared as a "keep" vote, as the editor had already voted once. Also note that user is the original author. Realkyhick 17:28, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Very weak keep. Author needs to change his external links from generic home-page links to those that are specifically about the subject. He or she also needs to learn proper internal Wikipedia linking, and Wikipedia style in general, particularly concerning citations. Verification is weak at best. The subject itself passes notability, but barely. Realkyhick 17:28, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.