Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerTracks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WjBscribe 23:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] PowerTracks
Product doesn't meet WP:ORG. Even on the product's press reviews page [1] only one of the magazines really exists (and there the only review that I can find is one paragraph that's part of a larger article). Scott.wheeler 19:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete reads like an ad. The price is not generally of encyclopedic concern, and the specs don't distinguish it. YechielMan 02:57, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 12:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Merge into Digital audio workstation. --Crunch 11:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Honestly that's probably a bad idea as it looks like the DAW page could use the same cleanup that I did to the sequencer page. It really becomes counterproductive at some point to list every DAW / sequencer that's ever been made. I went through on the sequencer page and removed those that wouldn't meet usual notariety requirements. Scott.wheeler 12:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 02:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Also thinks it looks like an ad. Cretor titled his/her edit as "Introducing PowerTracks", which kind of supports the theisis. Corpx 03:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete There used to be guidlines under WP:Notibility (software) but this went under. For mine WP:WEB and WP:N apply in general so the article fails.--Dacium 07:29, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:A. These links are not 2nd party sources. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:50, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Reads like an ad.Shindo9Hikaru 22:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
