Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post Oak Middle School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is clear consensus that this article belongs on Wikipedia in some form or another, either as is or as a merge/redirect to Spotsylvania County Public Schools. Since there is no consensus to delete, the conversation about the proper location may take place elsewhere per Help:Merge. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Post Oak Middle School

Post Oak Middle School (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Posting on afd for discussion, original prod reason was "reason nn middle school" (exact words), quick Google search indicates that it may have some notability. Listing for discussion. Vivio Testarossa^{Talk Who} 02:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 03:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect to district as standard policy. CRGreathouse (t | c) 05:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
• Merge/redirect to Spotsylvania County Public Schools. TerriersFan (talk) 17:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Merge anything useful to the district and then leave as a redirect for the search term TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 17:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. I was able to find several news articles on the opening of the school, poor performance on state tests, and initiatives to improve, thus making a verifiable, NOR, and NPOV article possible. DoubleBlue (Talk) 21:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
• Merge to Spotsylvania County Public Schools. Not even close to meeting WP:ORG or any proposed version of WP:SCH. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - It has received non-trivial coverage from independent reliable secondary sources, the core criterion of both WP:NOTABILITY and WP:ORG. --Oakshade (talk) 18:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Weak keep - but needs de-stubbification and more sourcing. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.