Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Possibility paradox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:29, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibility paradox

Possibility paradox (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Original research, and silly besides ("My guess is you won't"). Alksub 04:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete That's some very intersting OR, but OR nonetheless. i ^said 06:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per original research Corpx 06:44, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Utter nonsense. Faithlessthewonderboy 08:19, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Ghits for +"possibility paradox" -wikipedia come up with 24, most of which are for statements that use the two words in an ordered list. The phrase comes up only for a couple message boards. Ghits are not a sign of notability, admittedly, but something that doesn't even come up with a potential lead towards anything resembling a reliable source to prove it even exists, let alone is notable.. well, proves its lack of notability enough for me. spazure (contribs) (review) 08:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as OR. Dbromage [Talk] 11:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Snowball Delete as OR and POV. Besides .. it makes my head hurt. Where's the aspirin? --Trippz 14:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Very original research. Calgary 14:47, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Comment If a few sources (i.e., more than one or two) could be cited to show that someone has made a published observation of a possibility paradox, then it would make all the difference in the world on whether to Keep or Delete. I've never heard of this particular exercise in logical thinking. It would have been common sense for the author, who thought this was notable, to reveal a source. There's probably a paradox here about something that is famous, but nobody knows that it is famous. Mandsford 17:32, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Comment If nobody knows that it's famous, how famous can it be? ;) Faithlessthewonderboy 22:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per Minor Headache, Non-notable OR and POV -Flubeca^Talk 19:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as original research, sources unlikely to exist. -- Huon 21:37, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.