Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porsche Club of America

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily Kept. It doesn't take much any virtue of the imagination to see that this is a point-making bad faith nomination as has been discussed both here and externally. 2k2BlackWRX nominated the article only three minutes after having created an account. Non-administrative closure. WilliamH (talk) 19:54, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Porsche Club of America

Porsche_Club_of_America (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

fails wp:nn —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2k2BlackWRX (talk • contribs) 2008/05/27 15:34:57

  • Keep and improve. Google News and Book searches show abundant sustained coverage from WP:RS to satisfy general notability and WP:ORG. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep: Notable organization that has existed for more than 50 years. Google News shows articles dating back to 1956 and an AutoWeek article about the 50th anniversary of the club [1]. DCEdwards1966 18:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Comment: Probably a bad faith nom since the first act of the user was to nominate this article and his username shows a preference for Subarus. DCEdwards1966 18:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep, clearly notable. Bad faith nomination from a WP:SPA account associated with a previous debate located here. During that debate, threats were made both on wiki and on the subject's blog that they would retaliate by nominating this article for deletion. The user name User:2k2BlackWRX is an exact match to a forum contributor at the NASIOC forum. This is hilarious, though, got a good chuckle from it :-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per Keeper76 and DCEdwards. This article could use for expansion and sourcing but I see no reason to doubt notability. -Verdatum (talk) 20:12, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  • The article needs some sources included - it has none at the moment. However, it's clearly notable, so keep. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:17, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.