Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pornstar Pets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. -- BD2412 ^talk 05:23, July 10, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pornstar Pets

Simply advertising for some porn movie. Not encyclopedic information. Dan Granahan 2 July 2005 08:21 (UTC)

• Delete. So it seems. Anser 2 July 2005 11:01 (UTC)
• Weak keep if it gets cleaned up. It has an IMDB entry, and about 750 google hits. But current content is a copyvio of [1]. Pburka 2 July 2005 14:13 (UTC)
  • I have rewritten the article. Pburka 2 July 2005 15:47 (UTC)
• Keep and rewrite as it's got IMDB hits, otherwise delete as it appears to be advertising material right now. Robchurch 2 July 2005 14:51 (UTC)
• Delete - non-encyclopedic JoJan 2 July 2005 15:50 (UTC)
• Looks keepworthy to me (at least, as it is now). DS July 2, 2005 15:54 (UTC)
• Keep interesting article. i hope this movie will come to Germany too.MutterErde 2 July 2005 20:42 (UTC)
• Keep - not for the porn stars (who cares?) but for the pets! Notable, and oddly encyclopedic. --Mothperson 3 July 2005 00:12 (UTC)
• Having seen the rewrite, I would now be inclined to keep this article, as it fulfils my personal criteria for "encyclopedic" content. Rob Church 3 July 2005 12:52 (UTC)
• Keep interesting article. JamesBurns 4 July 2005 01:40 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-encyclopedic. Either that or someone should start to make a full copy of IMDb into WP. --Nabla 2005-07-04 01:50:42 (UTC)
• Keep - As near as I can tell this is not "some porn movie" but a valid documentary examining pet culture and erotica worker culture in America. Worthwhile article and sounds like an interesting film. --WCFrancis 4 July 2005 07:49 (UTC)
• Keep. It's a genuine documentary. -- Crevaner 5 July 2005 12:13 (UTC)
• Keep - From a NPOV perspective, it is no different than any other adult film or other film genre already on Wikipedia.SD6-Agent 6 July 2005 22:15 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.