Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pornographic vandalism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. NSLE _(T+C) at 04:43 UTC (2006-05-25)

[edit] Pornographic vandalism

Tagged "prod", prod removed by anon. Now here. A collection of trivia, really. Dr Zak 03:53, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete ~Kylu (u|t) 04:20, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• 'Delete. DS 04:27, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Retian - good article by wikipedia standards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.200.116.71 (talk • contribs)
  • Comment The above user twice removed the prod tags without comment, and once removed the AfD tag without comment. This IP address has also been blocked eleven times, including six hours ago. -- Kicking222 04:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Worthless Comment I just had to say, lol. --Dakart 09:11, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Terence Ong 04:32, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Kicking222 04:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Jersey Devil 05:15, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete- Wikipedia is not an indescriminate collection of information, nor is it a dumping ground for wild speculation. Reyk _YO! 05:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I expected this to be about Wikipedia vandals adding pictures of genitalia everywhere. Anyway, that Little Mermaid thing has always been fiction. This is nearly a personal essay. CanadianCaesar Cæsar is turn’d to hear 05:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I think I understand where the author was going with this. He just didn't get there. Aguerriero (talk) 07:01, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --MaNeMeBasat 09:38, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Kristjan Wager 11:36, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete 17 Ghits.--Jusjih 14:27, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Alphachimp ^talk 19:14, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I'm sure that the world will be able to cope with the loss of this article. Lankiveil 23:35, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This doesn't need a wikipedia page dedicated to it. --Dakart 09:11, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and others. Paddles 15:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete trivia as per nom Bacmac 17:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.