Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pornocracy (term)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 18:58, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pornocracy (term)

See also Pornocracy (AfD discussion).

This article is unencyclopedic in several ways - most prominently, it is rife with POV terms. No sources are cited. It seems to only be a subjective analysis of the main Pornocracy article detailing a period in the history of the papacy. I propose deletion given that any actual information contained here is covered in the main article. According to the disambiguation page, a book with this title is being released this year - if it deals with this subject, perhaps this article can be remade then. For now, it's best we put this one to rest. I'm surprised it's lasted this long and wasn't speedied. --BDD 06:22, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, fails WP:NPOV. --Coredesat 09:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Anything not POV is already covered in the main article. This should just go. Fan1967 15:41, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, hopelessly POV. --Aguerriero (talk) 16:19, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per the above. NPOV not recoverable without the article becoming a mere dicdef. Tevildo 17:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to The Rule of the Harlots, much better article. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 17:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, its a POV mess. hateless 21:31, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per hateless. No need to redirect as Pornocracy will get you there. --DaveG12345 21:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete It's PoV, redundant, OR and not really properly wikified. What isn't wrong with it? Ace of Sevens 23:26, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

• Well, I think all the words are spelled correctly. Fan1967 18:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Ardenn 18:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.