Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porncasting
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete as neologism/spam. - ulayiti (talk) 13:38, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Porncasting
Neologism/advertisment for WatchMePaint.com listed above.-- GraemeL (talk) 21:10, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
- I believe that if a person/company/organization plays a critical role in establishing a new term, then that person/compnay or organization should be credited as a pioneer. It would be wrong for any porn maker to list himself under pornography but in this case - since this is a very new idea - WatchMePaint.com should be credited with being one of the pioneers. This is just my opinion. (preceding unsigned comment by 206.69.163.39 (talk • contribs) )
- Delete yet another non-notable neologism Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 22:13, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
- I have cleaned up the article a bit, removing the advertising and adding some links where it has been used (most notably on the Guardian blog). However, I still think this belongs in iPod, because this would not have come about without the addition of a screen to the latest iPod. So merge to iPod. Jacqui ★ 06:45, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
-
- I would support Jacqui's suggestion but only to the extent of noting that adding "casting" to the end of everything has become a popular form of neologism, with this as a siongle-word example. It's not as if the conept is anythign other than blindingly obvious from the name, after all. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 09:39, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete advert --Rogerd 03:08, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.