Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Population of East Anglia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 06:28, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Population of East Anglia

information already contained in East Anglia article, maybe worthy of a redirect Babajobu 14:22, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and expand. Article will eventually need to be forked off anyway. -- Natalinasmpf 14:51, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete (without prejudice to further articles there). The info there is nonsense, East Anglia has rather more than ten thousand people. Morwen - Talk 15:25, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete This article could easily be turned into a list of areas conjoining East Anglia. No need for them all to have on page just for one sentence. Consider expanding this if someone can come up with figures for gender ratio, age dispertion, population concentration, per capita income, etc.Telesque 16:18, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, hoax (incorrect info), and of course the population of East Anglia could and should be given in the East Anglia article. Dcarrano 16:26, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, a simple fact like population obviously doesn't need to be in its own article. Phoenix2 18:54, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, even if the figure were accurate. Contrary to Natalinasmpf's assertion, I think there is enough room in the East Anglia article for a single number, and there will likely remain to be for some time. -R. fiend 20:26, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.