Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poppenkast

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deizio talk 02:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Poppenkast

Prod'ed after two months of inactivity, an anon removed the Prod and put an "under construction" note on the page, but it's not even clear what this is supposed to be. Article says it's "a game design and development community" but no website is listed for it. Unable to get anything from google because it's a common word in Dutch. Googling with the listed game names gets a tiny handful of forum posts, so looks quite non-notable. -- Fan-1967 01:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Non notable, whatever it is. I searched Google for Poppenkast+community and got less than 500 results, many of them simply because the word appeared in the middle of a Dutch sentence.--Húsönd 03:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Tempted to db-bio it. Resolute 06:03, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - but there should be a db-underconstruction tag --ArmadilloFromHell 06:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete: poppenkast plus one of the games gives no Google hits at all, another gives one google hit from a gamers forum. Utterly non notable, and unverifiable. Fram 12:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. Non-notable, and its current form is complete nonsense. --- RockMFR 22:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • 'Delete per Hús Cynical 22:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 02:19, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - page has been under construction since creation. Should be constructed in a user sandbox before creating page in main wiki. Matthuxtable 11:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Non-notable/nonsense. Delta Tango | Talk 01:47, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment An anon has edited the article and added the following: "They were formed on the 14th of august 2005, and have grown from a handful of members to a bit over twenty." I think that pretty well says it all. Fan-1967 14:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.