Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pootron bomb

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 09:38, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pootron bomb

Has only four hits on a google search, therefore unable to establish notability. I'm sure I've heard of such a weapon somewhere before, but never heard it referred to as the "Pootron". Oliver Keenan 20:12, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, very likely hoax or joke. The "inventor"'s name "A. Johnson" is most likely intentionally chosen to frustrate any Google searching. If it existed at all, the article would need to be created under its real name, because Google hits show that it is not known at all under the current title. -- Curps 21:36, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Actually, I think it's further evidence of a hoax, since... well, see Things called Johnson.

• Delete, probably hoax or joke. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:11, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, hoax. Megan1967 03:57, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nonsense. Oliver, you're probably thinking of brown note. Gazpacho 11:43, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.