Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poodlefaker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete per CSD:G7. Stifle (talk) 21:01, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Poodlefaker

Poodlefaker dates from the early 20th century and denotes a man given to attending tea parties and other female-dominated events for the purposes of social advancement. 100 years on and it is newly relevant, to denote a man prepared to feign feminist sympathies (and roll on his back like a poodle) for the purposes of social (or more usually sexual) advantage. Don't delete it!

It appears that this article was nominated for deletion in April, but the nominator never got around to editing this template page. Meanwhile, someone else went to the template and added the above text the next day, which is the only version of this template in the history. I am listing this now. TheProject 16:58, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Transwikied orphaned dicdef. TheProject 16:58, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete I can't even vote for a transwiki because I have no idea what this page is saying or what the definition actually is. If this can be clarified, then I'd definitely say "transwiki and delete." -- Kicking222 18:33, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • delete wow. Dominick (TALK) 19:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Transwiki per Kicking222 if this can be verified. It's not "newly relevant" just because the author wants it to be. 216.140.95.130 19:14, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete unverified --Bachrach44 20:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Hi I am the author of this page - and agree it is not appropriate for Wikipedia - please feel free to delete Actuarial Disco Boy 20 May 6:52 (AEST)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.