Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poo poo blowjob

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted by Lucky 6.9 (talk · contribs) as NN neologism.

[edit] Poo poo blowjob

OK; some people seem to think this is patent nonsense; however some people would suggest otherwise since some coprophiles obsess about sucking feces [1]. It seems that somebody on Newgrounds obsessing about sucking poop seems to confirm that sucking poop does exist.

• Keep to alert people who are reading Wikipedia articles about the risks of feces. --Nintendude ^message 00:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Nintendude. Also; feces are very controversial when it comes to eating them. --ZFU738 00:10, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The expression "poo poo blow job" gets 2 Ghits neither of which appear to be relevant. Therefore the term itself is a non-notable neologism. We can cover this material (and in fact, already have) at coprophilia. No need for a separate article with a title that will never be searched for (therefore, no redirect necessary.) Interestingly, in researching my opinion, I just learned that a search for "Eat shit" redirects for coprophilia. That's both sensible and amusing. Dina 00:13, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Dina. This is someone's idea of a sick joke. - Lucky 6.9 00:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: I don't like making accusations, but Nintendude's edit history is extremely suspect. Just my two cents. - Lucky 6.9 00:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Dina. This is at least the third such article I've seen in the last week with a similiar topic, but an equally inapprorpiate title. JPG-GR 00:18, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment/Question Since Nintendude created this Afd after removing a db-nonsense tag shouldn't s/he abstain from voting? I am under the impression that nominators for Afd must support the deletion of the article. (I could be wrong though.) Dina 00:19, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

• Note: Dina says that "poo poo blowjob" only gets 2 google hits; however we can rename this article and keep it if there is a similar taboo act which actually exists. Also, I believe that "ZFU 738" is a license plate number of a car that a former Clarenceville student drives; and why would a user use a familiar license plate number as a username? isn't that disturbing? --Clarenceville Trojan 00:21, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment The point is that we already have an article that describes this taboo act -- coprophilia. We don't need to rename this one and we don't need an article about this specific non-notable neologism. Dina 00:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

• Yes, and that same person has a history of feces-related nonsense. This is going away as a speedy. Let it clog a toilet instead of AfD. - Lucky 6.9 00:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

I saw that history and I agree this is all WP:BOLLOCKS but I'm not certain what speedy criteria would suffice. Dina 00:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

• Non-notable neologism. It be bye-bye.  :) - Lucky 6.9 00:27, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.