Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pon And Zi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:21, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pon And Zi

Non-notable comic. Prod removed with no explanation. cholmes75 (chit chat) 01:28, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per WP:NN. --Bill (who is cool!) 01:31, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. DarthVader 01:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete per nom, sillyness.--Andeh 01:45, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete It is notable to a degree, but not enough information is provided by the author to make it notable.  Heltec  talk 
  • Delete The site linked to from the article appears to be a fan effort not endorsed by the Pon and Zi artist. In fact, according to his deviantArt page, he seems to be somewhat distressed about it.[1] Looks to be a bit of a mess and we really don't need an article about this just now. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 03:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Normally I copy online comic-related articles over to Comixpedia, but I'm not going to in this case. It's a sub-stub article and the copyright issues give me a headache, so I'm taking a pass. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 04:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 04:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn comic. --Terence Ong 04:17, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, per nom. - Motor (talk) 07:58, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Nearly Headless Nick 10:31, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per the nominator. Yamaguchi先生 15:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn + too short. MaxSem 17:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete really quite non-notable as a webcomic. Artist seems dislike the existance of its archive, and, without the archive, there'd have been no evidence it even existed. Kevin_b_er 01:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Completely NN. Tachyon01 04:42, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.