Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polybiography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Kurykh 19:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Polybiography

Doesn't seem to be used in the sense given in the article (as history term); rather seems to be a (rarely) used term dealing with medical ultrasonography (149 Google hits). Neutrality^talk 04:16, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as protologism. I think the sonography angle is just coincidence -- the author is deliberately inventing a term for what he sees as a unique variant of oral history. It is proposed in the context of the history of medical sonography. But it does not seem to have spread much beyond this limited project.--Dhartung | Talk 05:56, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NEO. Realkyhick 07:32, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per all of the above. Also, the only cite is a dead link. Bearian 18:14, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.