Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politics-Britain.

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted by SWAdair (Indecipherable) --cesarb 01:53, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Politics-Britain.

I'm not sure what to make of this, I almost tagged it as {{nonsense}}. As it stands I think it should be deleted as original research. At the very least it needs moved to a better title and given a heavy copyedit JeremyA 02:57, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Topic is already sanely covered elsewhere. This is POV gibberish, and apparently the author's original research as well. -- BD2412 ^talk 03:14, 2005 Jun 10 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. I Added Nonsense tag -- this is gibberish, or a new form of poetry. Churchill was great, but this guy can't connect a thought. Don't know where you all see even research, save perhaps research as to how long this posting can last w/o being deleted! Fabartus 04:08, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Fair enough—I was trying to be gentle under the 'not biting new users' policy. JeremyA 04:24, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Thanks for trying, LOL. That's a policy "more honored in the breach than the observance" around here. Kappa 06:56, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Speedily deleted. Oddly enough, it did read like a new form of poetry. SWAdair | Talk 05:51, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.