Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political Test Dummy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:49, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Political Test Dummy

The website doesn't even exist yet - that makes it hard to be notable. BigDT 00:49, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Hardly any Google hits, seems to be spam. Mdwh 00:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Richardcavell 00:53, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Buy an ad. Aplomado ^talk 01:13, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I suppose that something which does not yet exist can still be notable ("Tony Blair's resignation" is filling the news here, although it's some way off yet), but this article makes no claim of noatbility other than hype. --BrownHairedGirl 01:18, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Spam--Nick Y. 01:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn spam.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 01:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Gyre 04:09, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete spam.User_talk:Dlohcierekim 04:25, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete A website can't be notable if it doesn't exist. There is no requirement to promote such a non-existent site, either.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  04:51, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. DarthVader 09:17, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per Mdwh.--Eva ^db 09:34, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

How can you judge the value of a website on whether you have heard of it or not. There are literally millions of websites. Political Test Dummy plays in integral part in the development of youth opinion within the media in Australia. May I suggest you are out of touch. Judge on the merits of its aim, not the current numbers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.41.236 (talk • contribs)

• Delete, the passage above makes it clear it's a crystal-ball issue. ProhibitOnions 12:24, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per the reasons given by ProhibitOnions and others. Vizjim 14:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Crystal ball -- Samir (the scope) धर्म 17:56, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete 61.68.41.236: You need to realize that, no matter what the aims of an organization, it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia if it doesn't exist. For example, Nazis are in wikipedia because of their (former) numbers, not because of their aims. M1ss1ontomars2k4 22:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

The Website does exist, www.politicaltestdummy.com - Try reading the note that says they are currently 're-developing', not 'developing', but 're-developing. Or alternatively, attempt to Google the words 'Political Test Dummy'.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.34.87 (talk • contribs)

Comment But right now there's nothing - perhaps wait until it's "redeveloped" before writing an article? Anyhow, it only gets 30 Google hits [1], that's nothing. In fact, 13 are from the website itself, 9 from Wikipedia, and the rest are just someone spamming in various webforums! Mdwh 14:32, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.