Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Policijska stanica
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete all. Jaranda wat's sup 21:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Policijska stanica
Non-notable film series. As far as I can tell [1], there is only VHS/DVD edition of this B-production series of comedies (i.e. it wasn't even in the cinema). The articles contain mostly the plots and character descriptions; Wikipedia ≠ IMDB ≠ YouTube. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see any serious reviews, no reliable sources, thus... no articles. Duja► 07:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm also nominating the following articles, from the same walled garden:
- Policijska stanica 2 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Policijska stanica 4: Dom sindikata (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Jugovizija 2007 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Kursadžije (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
and the characters:
- Ludi Milojko (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Ajdemi Popuši (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Dimče Seksovski (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Đuro Palica (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Duja► 07:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 17:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 17:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep, contingent on improvement. --Milton 20:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I asked the creator to reference several of these on 13 June, with no reply or action. There are no IMDB /AMG listings or any other good references for any of the above. Violates WP:RS w/ notability concerns. SkierRMH 20:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Gnangarra 12:05, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree with Milton, also contingent on improvement. In the meantime, however, I see nothing wrong with this article, aside from being a stub. --Slugmaster 01:11, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Except for the fact that it after 14 days there are still no references given and they're all still in violation of WP:RS. SkierRMH 16:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as nn. --MaNeMeBasat 09:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.