The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per cleanup. (aeropagitica) 19:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete per WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. Jersey Devil 18:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete Wikipedia is not a casebook.-- danntmTC 20:24, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
The article was a straight dump of parts of the the court's decision. It is now, however, a proper stub on a subject that made the news. Keep. Uncle G 11:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Keep the cleaned up stub. The best outcome of an AFD discussion is an improved article.GRBerry 02:47, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.