The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 00:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Unreferenced, POV, at some points it proves a bit incoherent... I think this material should be deleted. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete Per nom. Nat Tangta | co | em 10:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Onnaghar (speak.work) 14:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.