Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokemon Natures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pokemon Natures

It's a guide to an aspect of the games. See What Wikipedia is not. Coltonblue 04:05, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, Wikipedia is not GameFAQs. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 04:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No attempts to reference given aside from that implied by the title. Most importantly, it appears to be an orphan article, suggesting that WP:POKE had no plans to include an article in their project. Current formatting does not add value above the raw facts detailed (for instance, lists of pokemon with the natures). LinaMishima 08:49, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, listcruft, game guide, no context. JIP | Talk 09:20, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Good call. --Mecanismo | Talk 10:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Pokemoncruft. --Terence Ong _{(T | C)} 11:55, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:NOT as a game guide. Thε Halo ^Θ 18:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 20:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• delete per above--Peephole 20:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Neier 21:09, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Cleanup THe current version is a game guide, but I'm fairly sure it's possible to do a decent article abotu this. Refer to the Pokemon Project. Ace of Sevens 00:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete or cleanup Either is fine. TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 00:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.