Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokemon Flynon version

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Honestly, I don't care whether the article gets into BJAODN or not. But if someone wants it there so bad, they can ask me for the content. Sr13 06:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pokemon Flynon version

Pokemon Flynon version (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Clearly unreferenced and unsupported. This article appears to be either a hoax or a piece of wishful thinking on the part of its creator. Note, for example, the complete lack of references on Google, as well as the fact that most of the sections are copied from the author's user page. BassoProfundo 21:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete- clearly a hoax only google result was an adult blog ChrisLamb 21:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as a hoax. Someone has some, um, "interesting" wishful thinking. Useight 22:15, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. John Vandenberg 15:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete Per nom. FunPika 01:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. Doesn't exist. --The Raven's Apprentice (PokéNav|Trainer Card) 16:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and indef block User:Austin7895 and User:Sa007ak (probable sock puppets), only contribution : this article and duplicates on their user pages. They keep uploading images they find at random on internet with no license tag, and have no contribution unrelated to "Pokemon Flynon" thing. Jackaranga 01:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Hold on-- Move to a supbage of BJAODN. Then speedy the redirect. --The Raven's Apprentice (PokéNav|Trainer Card) 02:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Hold on per The Raven's Apprentice. JumpingInSlowMotion 07:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete-Delete this article already, this hoax, proves how flawed Wikipedia's policies are, there's no question that this is fake. Wikipedia is flawed and this article should have been deleted the day it was written. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.159.61.28 (talk)
    • Dude, don't be a mastodon. :) --02:52, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.