Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon Gold & Silver Remake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nishkid64 03:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pokémon Gold & Silver Remake

Pokémon Gold & Silver Remake (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

The whole page seems like speculation. There are no resources and it seems to be heavily original research. If the article doesn't get deleted, a complete rewrite is needed. Douglasr007 01:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

• Stong Delete no sources whatsoever. Also the "evidence" provided is clearly OR. --70.48.175.143 01:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Clear OR. ' ^{(Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!)} 02:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Most items in the genre are fangames, original research no matter what, and it might NOT happen. We just don't know...yet. TRKtvtce 02:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC), WP:PCP
• Delete as Original Research. No such announcement has been made, and the article author tries to come up with "evidence" that there will be a remake. TJ Spyke 02:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Aren't there 500 Pokemon articles already? --TeckWiz^TalkContribs_@ 23:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. It speculates about what may happen about this game being remade. Wikipedia is not the future. Ronbo76 03:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. Total original research and speculation. Overall is very poorly put together. Ganfon 03:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete OR and mainly speculation.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 03:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination (speculation & original research). —S.D. ¿п? 04:12, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom-DESU 04:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:OR, WP:NOT a crystal ball. Terence Ong 04:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 06:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as OR. Alex43223 ^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C} 08:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Darthgriz⁹⁸ 18:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ← ANAS ^Talk? 20:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL --Shirahadasha 20:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Completely specualted based on the release of Pokémon FireRed and LeafGreen and screenshots from the most recent games Pokemon Diamond and Pearl. Externally unverifiable original research and gazing into crystal balls. Delete per nomination. -- saberwyn 10:46, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL.Exarion 00:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
  • In this case, it would be better to call it POKÉMONCRYSTAL. TRKtvtce 14:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.