Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Point of Existence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep.  (aeropagitica)  23:05, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Point of Existence

Cruft; written in UE tone.--Zxcvbnm 03:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

• Comment I don't know, the topic itself doesn't seem too bad. Seems fairly notable as far as mods go. Google turned up a lot of hits, and it won that award. It was definitely not NPOV though. I've cleaned it up somewhat, however the section on the sequel needs work from someone who knows about it as it's really out of date. --Ricaud 03:37, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Googling "Point of Existence" "battlefield vietnam" yields 189,000 hits. Feezo (Talk) 09:49, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• keep notable. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 20:43, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep notable B.ellis 21:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --MaNeMeBasat 08:44, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. First off the bat, if an article is written badly, it should be marked for cleanup rather than deletion, thats the general way we deal with those articles on Wikipedia (see WP:CR). The topic itself is certainly notable, from my observations it is probably the second most popular mod for the Battlefield series (behind Desert Combat). Google backs the notability up rather convincingly: [1]. If this is 'cruft' then we have a LOT of deleting ahead of us. Remy B 14:35, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. ---Dana 02:55, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. Kraf 15:25, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.