Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pofmagazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 04:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pofmagazine

Pofmagazine (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unverifiable article on a non-notable magazine. The 68 unique ghits don't help. MER-C 08:43, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• There are several free city-specific magazines in the Netherlands (at least 2 in Utrecht for example). It would be quite possible for this to be noteworthy depending on the circulation. Have you tried to get someone from Turkey to do a search in their own language? - Mgm|^(talk) 00:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Caknuck (talk) 04:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan 07:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NOTE. --Brewcrewer 08:46, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete... this has been re-listed and still has no references supporting notability. Epthorn 10:46, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Masterpiece2000 12:30, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete due to lack of reliable third-party sources that appear to exist.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 16:46, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.