Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poe's law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Kirill Lokshin 05:50, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Poe's law

This seems too esoteric. I don't really see how it could be expanded to a suitable length. Dante 04:22, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Non-notable, neologism, vanity/fancruft. Cookiecaper 05:06, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Neologism specific to a single website.Indium 09:55, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Indium. TheMadBaron 10:07, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Indium. Prashanthns 15:27, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
• Comment Is there such a thing on Wikipedia as "Christcruft"? Dante (Δαντε) 18:58, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into List of adages named after people. There are at least two other sayings out there called "Poe's law", by the way. Google sez. GTBacchus 02:56, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn minor neologism not in wide use. MCB 23:59, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.