Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podpolianske strojárne Detva

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, but move. W.marsh 21:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Podpolianske strojárne Detva

Podpolianske strojárne Detva (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Delete Notability not established. TonyTheTiger 18:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, without prejudice. This is apparently a Soviet-era weapons factory in Slovakia that went on to make bulldozers and heavy machinery. From the information given this may be a non-notable business, though I would be open to persuasion either that the factory is notable or that WP:CORP shouldn't apply. - Smerdis of Tlön 20:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, thanks to Dhartung, with the understanding that the article should be moved and changed to reflect the fact that it is about the business rather than the plant itself. - Smerdis of Tlön 05:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep and move to Cestné a Stavebné Mechanizmy Tisovec (or CSM Tisovec), thousands of results, at least one in English[1]. In addition to co-manufacturing with Western European companies they have a significant presence in Russia.[2] --Dhartung | Talk 21:59, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and move to Cestné a Stavebné Mechanizmy Tisovec (with a redirect from this and CSM Tisovec) per Dhartung's findings. --Oakshade 01:13, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - This article isn't Wikified, doesn't have sources, and is apparently misnamed. If this article has generated in some editor and interest and desire to create a proper article about this subject, that's fine. But this article shows no indication that much work into it and I vote delete with a clear conscience. Shaundakulbara 06:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Because an article isn't Wikified and it being misnamed aren't a reasons to delete, they're reasons to Wikify and rename. And sources establishing notability were found above. --Oakshade 07:48, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.