Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PmWiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep --DarkFalls ^talk 06:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] PmWiki

PmWiki (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

expired uncontested prod, but this article has been around awhile with many editors so it should be afd'ed not prod'ed. Prod tag was WP:N and WP:V and WP:SPAM, which about sums up what the article is. Carlossuarez46 23:59, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- KTC 03:30, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep per coverage. While most are trivial, there are some that qualify as "significant" Corpx 05:14, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep First of all, kudos to Carlossuarez46 for bringing this up on AfD. – PmWiki is quite comparable to MoinMoin which is currently the selected article on Portal:Free software. Google counts are similar for both (more so if you add "wiki" as a second keyword because "MoinMoin" is a German greeting). PmWiki is half a decade old and still under active development. It is widely deployed (obviously, these are self-reported and don't count in-house use). – That said, the article does need work. Rl 08:54, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. PmWiki is one of the most popular wiki servers in use today. Reliable source coverage [1] [2] [3] [4] etc... JulesH 16:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep PmWiki is a notable piece of software that is used on many websites. — Wenli ^(contribs) 03:45, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.