Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pleven (horse)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. — Trilobite (Talk) 14:16, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pleven (horse)

The articles Sardinian (horse), Salerno (horse), and Pleven (horse) were all posted within seven minutes of one another. They show remarkable consistency in format, almost as if they had been taken from a book on horses. A Google search for copyvio does not turn up any hits, which shows only that if these are copyvios, they are not from web resources. Denni☯ 01:55, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)

• Keep for my reasons stated at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Salerno (horse). - DS1953 02:04, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I don't see any persuasive reason to delete this. --Tabor 03:03, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Appears to be a model article. If you think it is a copyvio the onus is on you to come up with evidence. Then list it in the appropriate place, not here. CalJW 05:23, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep No copyvio proven although it would be good if the author could provide a source or sources. Capitalistroadster 06:48, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, looking suspicious isn't particularly a reason for deletion. -- Lochaber 09:15, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I think this is the creation of an anonymous editor who wants to contribute to Wikipedia with good articles. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:50, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - this is silly. If you're going to write a series of articles on similar subjects, it makes perfect sense to use a template article and change whatever details need changing for the specific article. Have a look at some of the articles on suburbs of New Zealand cities that I created - they used a set format. So of course four articles created within a few minutes on different horses will look similar. Grutness...wha? 07:06, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.