Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Player (dating)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no concensus. - Mailer Diablo 11:15, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Player (dating)

This page is not encylopedia and has no potential to become so. Thus it should be deleted. An entry at Wiktionary could possibly be created.--Plainsong 23:54, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. This is encyclopedic, and is already more than a dicdef. Well-written article that could be expanded upon. android↔talk 00:11, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and allow for organic growth. More than a dictionary definition. --GRider\^talk 00:42, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Zscout370 01:21, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Slang dictdef. —Lowellian (talk) 01:56, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, slang dictionary definition. Megan1967 03:52, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, notable "role" in some cultures. Kappa 07:11, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as dicdef (already in wikt). Radiant!Radiant_* 09:32, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, slangcruft. ComCat 02:12, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. If it's more than a dicdef, it's not much more. -R. fiend 03:19, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - all nouns (imho) have a place in wikipedia. Kingturtle 17:27, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. It's not just a slang term, it's a whole lifestyle. --FuriousFreddy 16:38, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete This is a dictionary definition. It does not belong here. --Zantastik 02:33, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.