Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Play Pirate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Play Pirate

Play Pirate (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

According to the author, this is a recently created neo/protologism. Unsourced original research, no assertion of notability. Acroterion _(talk) 20:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

• Plunder Delete as unsourced neologism with no significant usage as of yet. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:15, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete or even db-nonsense. Beach drifter (talk) 20:21, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:V, WP:N, WP:NOR, WP:NEO, WP:NFT... JohnCD (talk) 20:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

NFT was what I couldn't put my finger on, thanks. Beach drifter (talk) 20:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, or keel haul. Can't find significant usage in this sense; article says term was coined within the last three months, so hardly likely to have widespread usage.--Fabrictramp (talk) 23:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - no reliable sources --Starionwolf (talk) 03:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.