Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plannoay DVD Rating System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Plannoay DVD Rating System

Original research. No background. Appears to be something somebody just made up. Zero G-hits. --Xrblsnggt 02:00, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as original research. --Metropolitan90 02:04, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. Even the single word "Plannoay" returns zero Google hits. Johntex\^talk 02:12, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable method. --Sbluen 02:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, original research. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 02:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Uhhhh, I looked at it. I read it. I have a strong feeling that it's not original research at all, that it is a service provided for a fee or a sign up opt-in and that, therefore, what's really happening here is a form of advertising. I'm just not sure what the heck this system is supposed to do for people -- help pirates win arguments? Convince kids to pay full price? Settle video geek arm wrestling competitions? If the article can't even tell you the usefulness of the thing, it's a failure as an article and an ad. Geogre 02:38, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. SynergeticMaggot 03:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• DeleteWP:NOR or what Geogre said...either way it's a delete. Alphachimp ^talk 04:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Geogre. Voice of Treason 04:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Surely some sort of joke. Example: "[-3 points] If the star is an ex-wrestling personality." Nothing on Google or even Google groups. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:22, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Geogre's insightful comment. -(chubbstar) ^{— talk | contrib | 15:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.