Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Unicorn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Peacent 01:20, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Planet Unicorn
The entire article is unsourced and fails WP:WEB and notability standards in general quite miserably. Suggest the most speedy deletion possible after discussed. Burntsauce 23:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- DELETE Appears to be self promotion. Slow deletion is ok, as long as it is painful ;) Pharmboy 23:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy deletion is better and more humane. It's self-promotion, nearly spam. Realkyhick 00:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - yes, it's cute. No, I don't think it meets any of the notability guidelines. It was a major stretch to find sources for Salad Fingers, and this is not in the same league. --Haemo 01:26, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:WEB. Iotha 01:32, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- DO NOT DELETE This is a series that is quickly gaining popularity around the web and among gay communities. It's easy to source, and the fact that this series is becoming more and more popular is reason enough to have a factual article on it. Misterpartel 23:00, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
- Okay, if it's "easy to source" then could you produce some reliable sources for this article? --Haemo 04:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per lack of reliable sources - None found on a google news archive search Corpx 05:14, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per lack of notability. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 13:47, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete although it is cute per Haemo. Bearian 23:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete although I must admit, I have seen the videos, and it is hilarious! Sebi [talk] 08:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - It's on YouTube, so it must be notable. Right? Oh, apparently not :( Giggy UCP 09:05, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Burn- No reliable sources found to establish notability of the videos. The article is almost spam. --Boricuaeddie 19:15, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.