The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – RichFarmbrough. 22:59, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Doesn't seem particularly notable - fewer than a thousand google hits for a website? BD2412T 03:53, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Any vanity article by someone who can't even get basic formatting right is practically a speedy in my book. Daniel Case 04:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Delete nn, gamecruft.--MONGO 04:39, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
Delete per MONGO. Stifle 01:58, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.