Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plain Old Java Object

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  22:49, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Plain Old Java Object

Unsure about this one, but it looks to me like a jargon entry that is not that notable. I'd say it's a weak delete Tony Bruguier 02:50, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, well known term in the Java circles. There are books about this [1] [2] Weregerbil 10:29, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, well known term. --MaNeMeBasat 07:07, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep useful info Jordanmills 22:33, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep useful info ArgusCavalcante 12:15, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep good definition of POJO 19:12, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.