Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PixFeatures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 02:40, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] PixFeatures

PixFeatures (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article lacks reliable sources to verify notability for this organization, and my googling didn't yield better sources. Prod removed without comment or improvement by creator. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete pretty weak claim of notability and not verified. Pharmboy (talk) 17:24, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bongwarrior (talk) 08:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete NN organisation, and manages to get a POV issue into a one line article Mayalld (talk) 11:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 11:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - nn both references link to same article. One bit of news doesn't make the organization notable. See WP:NOT#NEWS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sting au (talk • contribs) 12:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - fails notability - couldn't really find any third party sources. Also fails WP:NOT#NEWS, as mentioned above. --Dawn bard (talk) 15:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete (without prejudice) - Does not appear notable in the article and investigative work by FisherQueen did not turn up anything. --Lquilter (talk) 17:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.