Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pistolos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:39, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pistolos

Delete hoax, joke, or mock dicdef, and unencyclopedic nonsense. See also AfD for Pistolas, AfD for Cinco de Ocho, articles by same author (Mastab), the latter also featuring nonsense about "pistolas" and "pistolos". MCB 05:27, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete see Pistolas above. --Clay Collier 06:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Even if cleaned up, this would be a mere dicdef. Rossami (talk) 06:59, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Comment Seeing as Pistolo's originated from the creation story of Cinco de Ocho, I do not see how you can possibly identify it as factually inaccurate. Would anyone care to elaborate on the reasoning behind this nomination? Mastab 17:07, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Do we need to go through all the reasons why?  RasputinAXP  talk * contribs 20:37, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Delete now this is clear nonsense --JAranda | watz sup 18:16, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Pistol. Also, this page was vandalized by Amdahlj (talk · contribs) [1] --Anetode 21:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Actually, the Spanish form of Pistol is pistola. --Clay Collier 07:54, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or redirect. the wub "?!" 22:49, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Until Conclusion of Seperate Debate As Pistolo's first entry was to explain the meaning behind Pistolo's as used in the article Cinco de Ocho it is only ift that this debate cease until the conclusion of the debate of Cinco de Ocho. Personally, it undermines people's right to information when people delete such articles as that. All it is attempting to do is establish a precedent for the culture and history behind the day of celebration Mastab 01:29, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Even if Cinco de Ocho isn't deleted (which is currently looking unlikely), this article seems to have no potential for expansion. A decision on this article can be made independent of the fate of the Cinco de Ocho article. --Clay Collier 07:54, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, then possibly redirect to prevent recreation. Xoloz 12:49, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.