Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piss cycle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Moved to last WP:BJAODN. :) --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Piss cycle

This article doesn't really belong in an encyclopedia in my opinion, also appears to be original research. Delete KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 04:10, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as hoax, original research. --InShaneee 04:13, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nominator. --Terence Ong Talk 04:42, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as a new year's experiment. Happy '06! Two more minutes! - Lucky 6.9 04:58, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, utterly non-notable. --LesleyW 07:59, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as original research. Movementarian 08:33, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable. -- (aeropagitica) UK 09:15, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Move Uncyclopaedia might want this one. ::shrug:: → P.MacUidhir (t) (c) 10:15, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Uncyclopedia stuff, really. Pavel Vozenilek 11:00, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as above. CalJW 12:01, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:NOR--MONGO 12:03, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete heh Sceptre (Talk) 17:51, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete not notable --a.n.o.n.y.m t 17:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Flush it down the same place as what the page is about. Anthony Appleyard 18:44, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable. Ajwebb 22:17, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, either hoax, joke, or original reserach, it has no place here. - Phædriel 23:59, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. TheRingess 00:36, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep I've heard of this concept - I don't think its a hoax and it's more of a generally amusing but commonly observed pub topic than original research..anon 03:10, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete bordering BJAODN. P.S. sending it to uncyclopaedia would be a transwiki, not a move Werdna648T/C\@ 12:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Move to Uncyclopaedia, then Delete. - Liontamer 22:07, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.