Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirimicarb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per snow (non-admin closure). Clear consensus that plentiful coverage in reliable sources asserts notability, with commentary that expansion is the ideal path of action. WilliamH (talk) 13:08, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pirimicarb

Pirimicarb (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Delete unsourced one-liner about a pesticide without reason to indicate it's a notable product. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:43, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep. 675 books, 4180 scholarly papers and 110 news items are all reasons that indicate it's a notable product. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Has enough information for a stub, seems notable, and even has a reference now. --Itub (talk) 15:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - relevant insecticide - Skysmith (talk) 16:29, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep It's not so much a product as it is an active ingredient in many products. The number of insecticides approved for agricultural use is limited, and the level of effort required to get that kind of approval indicates a high degree of commercial incentive, and therefore notability. The article certainly needs to be expanded, but not deleted. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:21, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - could do with expansion, but plenty of coverage in WP:RS demonstrate notability.--BelovedFreak 22:04, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, per Phil Bridger's comments. The article could use an expansion, though. Nsk92 (talk) 23:48, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep — It meets WP:N requirements with current reference, plus all the sources noted by Phil Bridger. Rosiestep (talk) 04:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, should be expanded. --Eleassar my talk 05:44, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.