Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirate Monkey Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete (WP:SNOW) --Zsinj^Talk 12:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pirate Monkey Films

Pirate Monkey Films (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

An assertion of notability is made (winning awards) so I didn't speedy it. Overall fails WP:N and most of the article is a bizarre "history," that is nonsense. janejellyroll 09:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, definitely nn -- feb^talk 09:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per WP:SNOW and WP:CSD#G11. Also fails WP:NFT. --JaimeLesMaths ^(talk!edits) 09:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - WP:SNOW. WP:N, per [1]. Someone just delete this nonsense now. Part Deux 09:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - G1 and G11... and I'd guess, probably G12, but it's hardly worth checking. Not notable, reads like an advert, replete with non encyclopedic language. --Dweller 10:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete but not speedy - as the nominator correctly points out, the list of awards is an assertion of notability, but the company nonetheless fails WP:CORP and the article fails WP:V. Walton monarchist89 10:41, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

  Comment - ah... perhaps incorrectly, I dismissed them as non notable awards. --Dweller 11:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

  Comment - as I suspected, the copy has been listed from elsewhere ([2]). Is copy taken from myspace a copyright infringement or not? --Dweller 11:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.