Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pippa Jefferys

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly (o rly?) 22:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pippa Jefferys

Pippa Jefferys (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Vanispamcruftisement, creator was BGModels (talk · contribs). Contested prod. MER-C 07:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, gsearch turns up less than stellar results. I'm sure she's a great person, but she's not notable of an encyclopedia entry. Part Deux 07:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, aging part-time model, one of thousands, with no notable accomplishments, likely creating entry for personal publicity —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.77.234.75 (talk) 13:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC).
  • Keep Note above from IP: 142.77.234.75 obviously made with prejudice. Please sign comments. Name of model remains linked from recently edited plus-size model page so apparent merit for entry to remain. BGModels 19:40, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep (please don't vote twice Part Deux 00:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC))Page has been updated, more substantial information added. Question what kind of accomplishments would satisfy when business criteria does not demand Ph.D? LOL Suggest retaining to broaden international content under plus-size model banner which is very US-heavy. BGModels 20:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Why not MOVE? Can someone with more Wiki-mojo create a multi-level entry at plus-size model so that separate pages for individuals are unnecessary? Just trying to figure out Wiki... BGModels 22:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete nn, not encyclopedic entry. --MaNeMeBasat 18:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.