Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pipiskin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Keeper | 76 19:55, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Pipiskin
No notability, a notorious prank, corresponding article was deleted in Russian WP. --ssr (talk) 16:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC) Further reasoning: the originating event was that editor flawed with fictional surname and was instantly fired the morning after. The consequent event was a huge temporary resonance in blogs and some news discussing RSS-exported flaw shortly removed from the originating article. Further talks on the "virtual politician", "his websites" "election candidate" are unrelated to the event's origins and are unnotable. Such an article was previously deleted in Russian Wikipedia with similar reasoning and blocked for further creation. --ssr (talk) 17:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Not encyclopedic.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. -- Russavia (talk) 19:52, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - on the grounds on WP:RS. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 00:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable.DonaldDuck (talk) 09:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a modern example of Russian "Lieutenant Kijé". Third reference (Russian) seems to be sufficient to establish notability. Need to be improved and better sourced.Biophys (talk) 23:56, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.