Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pine View High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pine View High School

Pine View High School (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Does not establish notability, and seems to attack its subject. FusionMix 20:20, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. Nominator tagged article for speedy 1 minute after creation and brought it to AfD the ripe old age of 5 minutes. I suggest giving the editor a chance to write the article. • Gene93k (talk) 20:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment I agree with Gene93k. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Reply, I realize that I neglected to check the time of its creation. It was a silly oversight on my part. FusionMix 22:00, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Schools are inherently notable. I've re-formatted it a bit and delted un-used sections. This article will develope a bit more over time, we just need to give it a bit more time. Undeath (talk) 22:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment. Since when did schools become 'Inherently notable'. It doesn't say that in the proposed guideline Wikipedia:Notability (schools). It sure doesn't say that in the guideline Wikipedia:Notability. Even Wikipedia:List of really, really, really stupid article ideas that you really, really, really should not create says that 'The high school you attend or used to attend...' can be safely assumed among the category of unnecessary articles. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 02:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
I repaired the essay you cited. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 02:37, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Wait. Allow the editors time to establish significance. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 02:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  • keep the school is big enough to be notable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep High schools are notable because with a little effort RS cites can be found for all high schools of any reasonable size. The article is already developing.--Cube lurker (talk) 03:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per overwhelming precedent that all high schools are notable, and per recent improvements I have made to the article. You can help! See WP:Edit. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 03:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep since the page has significant, secondary sources that meet WP:N. Pages should only be brought here where notability cannot be established, not because it hasn't been. Deletion tagging after 1 minute shows the nominator cannot have considered the alternatives listed in WP:DP. TerriersFan (talk) 04:37, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Snowball keep per the foregoing, unless the nominator cares to withdraw? --AndrewHowse (talk) 20:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep and snow this as obvious by looking at article that it passes notability. Sting au Buzz Me... 07:10, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep: While schools are not inherently notable (what a silly suggestion!), this article needs time to develop. CRGreathouse (t | c) 14:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.