Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pincey Park

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 07:30, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pincey Park

An article for a band who have yet to release a record, although the article claims that this may change in the near future (although the 8 google hits suggests it is not exactly widely awaited). non-notable, probable vanity. Rje 22:44, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete agree
    • Previous unsigned comment from Drini.
  • Delete non-notable bandcruft. --Kurt Shaped Box 23:08, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
  • How is this vain?????
    • Previous unsigned comment from 70.51.162.250.
      • It's vanity in the sense of WP:VANITY. It means that the article was probably written to promote the band, rather than simply to describe them. It's not intended as an insult to the writer -- in fact this article does seem to be factual and written in an appropriately neutral manner. However the band does not appear to be sufficiently notable to be included in Wikipedia at this time. Pburka 02:20, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NMG. --Howcheng 23:55, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
    • I don't think this should be deleted. It's just factual and does not seem to be promoting the band. Considering the band is signed to a major Record Label, I think it should be included in Wikipedia. (preceding unsigned comment by 70.51.137.179 03:43, 24 August 2005 (UTC))
      • Did you read WP:NMG? The band doesn't qualify under any of those conditions. --Howcheng 21:26, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
      • This user is from the same IP range as the previous anonymous voter. Poss. sockpuppet? --Kurt Shaped Box 21:51, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
        • Probably the same person just writing a second comment. --Howcheng 23:58, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.