Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pimpmysnack.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 19:13, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pimpmysnack.com

This site was marked as uncontested delete. I consider it meets the criterea in Wikipedia:Notability (web) so I would contest it. National media coverage on TV, radio and newspaper makes it notable within the UK, if not in the USA. I should point out I am not affiliated in any way with the site, I just thought it needed an article. It's a common topic of conversation in the UK. akaDruid 13:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. I suppose being covered by metro makes you a somebody. Mystache 13:15, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per nom (!) but note that you don't need to AfD an article on prod; just eliminate the prod and assert notability in the article. --Craig Stuntz 17:59, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, two significant news references. -- Mithent 18:43, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - verifiable. For great justice. 20:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets WP:WEB. — TheKMan^talk 23:25, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.