Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilsen Photo Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bencherlite^Talk 07:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pilsen Photo Group

Pilsen Photo Group (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

No claim in article of meeting WP:Notability. 51 non-wiki ghits, most of which are blogs and passing mentions; none of which show notability. Contested prod. Fabrictramp (talk) 14:10, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 14:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom as NN; no members or exhibition venues are notable; no shows outside Chicago. Creator has only made 2 edits not on this article. Johnbod (talk) 14:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:ORG. This fails the notability guideline. PeterSymonds | talk 15:08, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Agreed, unfortunately I was unable to find anything supporting notability either in the article or online. Lazulilasher (talk) 16:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Modernist (talk) 19:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete WP:PERNOM.  ;-) Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 20:06, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:ORG. -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.